mrdreamjeans: (Neil B)
[personal profile] mrdreamjeans
If you married your partner, would you take his/her last name? I had never considered what I would do until I reconnected with a friend in Germany last night. On September 5, 2003 my friend Daniel married his partner/lover/husband/husbear (What is a good term for this?) in a full church wedding, as well as in a civil ceremony held in Berlin’s City Hall the previous day.

Daniel and Stefan had an old-fashioned courtship. When I was working in Europe in 2002, Stefan formally proposed to Daniel during a romantic vacation and Daniel accepted. I was one of the first friends to hear the news. I was invited to the wedding, and if I couldn’t make that, to join them at some point on their honeymoon trip, Montreal or New York City. I wasn’t able to do either at the time as the funds to do so just weren’t there.

Daniel’s background is one I find uniquely European. His parents have been married nearly 40 years, yet his father has also had a Black male partner for over 20 years. The wife and lover know each other well and comfortably co-exist. Daniel’s straight sister is a policewoman. Stefan’s father is a truck driver. Everyone marches together in Pride Parades and Peace Marches. Everyone attended and supported the guys’ wedding and honor their relationship. To an American such as myself, this is the stuff of legends.... and it inspires.

When I met Daniel in Berlin in 1991, he took me to a performance of “Verdi’s Requiem” in a 17th century concert hall in East Berlin. (This was just a short time after the wall came down.) Daniel’s father was conducting the 85-piece orchestra and Daniel and his mother were singing in the 120-piece chorus. The performance and setting created an indelible memory. This special moment cemented our 13-year friendship which we renewed upon my return to Europe for a tour of “Evita” in 2002.

The months in Germany in 2002 gave me the opportunity to meet Stefan and to grow to like him. He adores Daniel, and Daniel is humbled by the adoration. They are a study in opposites.. Daniel came out at 13 and was in the bars and baths by mid-teens; Stefan is a late-bloomer and Daniel is his first love. Previously, Daniel wouldn’t date you unless you were over 40; Stefan and Daniel are very close in age. Whatever the differences, the chemistry is there.

Last evening Daniel sent me an instant message online, an occurence that made me particularly happy as we hadn’t spoken in several months and I didn’t have his new information. When I received the new address and phone number, I was surprised by one item. Daniel had taken his partner’s last name!

For some reason this shocked me. Daniel’s father is fairly famous in Germany, so the name is well-known. I understand honoring Stefan; but, at the same time, is this somehow disrespectful to Daniel’s family and their history? I can‘t even decide if I were in a relationship, and wanted to more formally cement the bond of love, what I would call the other person. Partner seems too business-like; significant other - too fussy and forced; lover - too public ; boyfriend - too casual; companion - mercenary.

I’ve never considered taking someone else’s name. When I thought I’d marry my college sweetheart, we thought we’d, at the most, hyphenate our last names. It feels like a sacrifice to me; I erase my identity and offer it to you. I would feel this way regardless of the gender combination involved.

Am I making too much fuss over a friend’s choice? I am intrigued though.... Would you choose to be identified as a couple using one last name? Does it, in an odd sense, replace the infrequent practice in previous decades, of adopting your partner to protect inheritance rights? Does this mean Daniel has assumed the role of “wife”? ( No judgement here, just curiosity...)

Would you take one name if children were involved? Would you feel comfortable as Mr. and Mr. Dan _____ or Ms. and Ms. Mary _____ ? The Jones - George and Bob? The Robertsons - Lynn and Laura, MD? Does this mean that Europeans are way ahead of us? Afterall, many of the rights we aspire to in America have been law in Europe for some time. Is taking your partner’s last name in marriage a step forward or step backward? I’d like to know what you think. It’s a new frontier.

Date: 2004-04-20 12:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gotmoof.livejournal.com
The growing American trend these days seems to keep emphasis on the woman keeping her own name. Why should she have to assume her identity if she prefers to keep her own? Thats not to say there aren't issues with this- my sister Jeanne still gets flak from people for keeping her name instead of taking Bernies. I think taking the name of your spouse is a extra step for some people, one that signifies a level of commiment thats really unnecessary these days. But you do raise a point- what about the children? Personally, in these situations, I think the kids should hyphenate the last names until they get old enough to pick what they want.
Does this mean Europeans are more advanced? Probably- in general, they seem to be much more tolerant of different lifestyles. In Daniel's family's case, his parents seem to be comfortable with their flamboyant life. They also sound like they are very supportive of Daniel, so I imagine they wouldn't have issues with his taking his partner's name for his own. I'd be curious to see how they feel about it though. Its certainly worthwhile to find out.

Date: 2004-04-20 01:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beingmee67.livejournal.com
"The growing American trend these days seems to keep emphasis on the woman keeping her own name."? Oh my God! Feminism is still hip in US? (LOL)

Excusez-moi but the whole name thing is pure crap. The only serious problem is what happens with the kids, if they exist. Choose what they like when they get "old enough"? That could set a whole new trend! ("Hey, I woke up this morning in the mood to change my last name.") Analysts are going to love this, anyway...

Date: 2004-04-21 12:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gotmoof.livejournal.com
Yeah, I'm subversive that way... I even think for myself and believe reality television sucks!

Another thought I had was that I believe it used to be common for parents to give their children gender-lineage based last names.
Jane Doe marries Michael Smith, they have two children, Sarah and Tom
Sarah, takes Jane's last name = Sarah, Daughter of Doe
Tom takes Michael's last name = Tom, Son of Smith

if we have a same-sex couple who are the parents, then I vote for whatever the kids want.

Date: 2004-04-21 11:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bruinwi.livejournal.com
Nice idea, Kow! It actually mirrors the naming convention suggested in a S/F story I read, but they switched genders: Sons took their MOTHER'S last name; daughters took their FATHER's.

Now, to answer an earlier question. I think women began taking their husband's names for at least two reasons: For the longest time, wives were considered the PROPERTY of their husbands. What better way to show this than thru a name change? Secondly, it made tracing lineage and inheritance rights easier.

Profile

mrdreamjeans: (Default)
mrdreamjeans

July 2024

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21 222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 8th, 2026 03:29 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios