DVD Players with Filters
May. 9th, 2004 12:13 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
mrdreamjeansI read an article by Mike Snyder of USA Today earlier this week that outlines the recent development of DVD players which filter content, essentially editing out whatever the folks who make the machines deem as unacceptable. They are going to be offered at WalMart for $70.
According to Snyder, the company, ClearPlay, has "built-in 'filters' designed to skip over violence and nudity and to mute salty language on 100 movies, including blockbusters such as Terminator 3 and The Matrix. The Utah-based company is adding more films to its filter library all the time. It now has more than 600 titles available for download."
The editing decisions are not made by the movie studios or by the directors, but by a handful of people in Utah. There is another company called CleanFlicks, based in Utah, that also is selling a similar product.
"Studios and filmmakers are stunned that someone not involved in the creative process could technologically chip away at their work - and make money at it", says Snyder. "So lawsuits aiming at getting the processes deemed illegal are underway."
Some of the same issues as the music trading over the internet seem to be in play. Trademark violations? Is it a copyright violation? Is it censorship in not-too-cloaked fashion? As a songwriter and produced playwright, I have very strong feelings about the subject.
ClearPlay says they are not going to filter movies such as "The Passion of Christ" and "Schindlers List" because of their artistic merit, but who or what determines their artistic worthiness?
I avoid most violence in film and did my own version of filtering by not seeing Mel Gibson's film. If I don't like the subject or know it is not to my taste...I don't go...I don't pay for a ticket. To me that's the logical thing to do. Don't like it, don't support it, but don't mess with the vision of the work's creative team.
What do you think? I'd like to know if you agree with this trend and to hear any other comments folks might have. I'm curious to see the dialogue.
According to Snyder, the company, ClearPlay, has "built-in 'filters' designed to skip over violence and nudity and to mute salty language on 100 movies, including blockbusters such as Terminator 3 and The Matrix. The Utah-based company is adding more films to its filter library all the time. It now has more than 600 titles available for download."
The editing decisions are not made by the movie studios or by the directors, but by a handful of people in Utah. There is another company called CleanFlicks, based in Utah, that also is selling a similar product.
"Studios and filmmakers are stunned that someone not involved in the creative process could technologically chip away at their work - and make money at it", says Snyder. "So lawsuits aiming at getting the processes deemed illegal are underway."
Some of the same issues as the music trading over the internet seem to be in play. Trademark violations? Is it a copyright violation? Is it censorship in not-too-cloaked fashion? As a songwriter and produced playwright, I have very strong feelings about the subject.
ClearPlay says they are not going to filter movies such as "The Passion of Christ" and "Schindlers List" because of their artistic merit, but who or what determines their artistic worthiness?
I avoid most violence in film and did my own version of filtering by not seeing Mel Gibson's film. If I don't like the subject or know it is not to my taste...I don't go...I don't pay for a ticket. To me that's the logical thing to do. Don't like it, don't support it, but don't mess with the vision of the work's creative team.
What do you think? I'd like to know if you agree with this trend and to hear any other comments folks might have. I'm curious to see the dialogue.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}