"Mama Mia", that's a tasty meatball bit of summer viewing fun! It took a month to reach us, but the film musical, starring Meryl Streep, finally reached Brenham. I took my folks yesterday and we thoroughly enjoyed the afternoon out of the 100 degree plus heat. Some of my friends will be surprised that I liked the movie, as I was quite vocal in how much I disliked the touring stage production I saw in Seattle.
A few comments ... Is there anything that Meryl Streep can't do? She was a funny, whimsical, bawdy and touching center to the film. She sang really well, especially knocking my socks off in "The Winner Takes It All". Amanda Seyfield, the young woman playing Sophie, her daughter, was simply splendid! The mother-daughter relationship between the two of them was completely believable. Julie Walters nearly stole the show as Streep's quirky cookbook author friend; Christine Baranski, with her roots firmly planted in Broadway, was a hoot as the thrice-divorced Sonia (though I admit her solo number on the beach was unexpectedly discomforting to me).
The male performances were a mixed bag. Pierce Brosnan and Streep certainly had chemistry, but his singing was amateurish. (It was actually better than I expected from what I'd read.) I didn't like the young actor playing Skye, Sophie's fiance, shirtless or with his shirt on. Now, Colin Firth ... that's another story ... *swoon* ... and his singing was quite good. What made the movie so much fun was the use of a literal Greek chorus that popped up at odd moments, played for laughs. Also, the gorgeous location in the Greek Islands didn't hurt the eyes! :) All in all, "Mama Mia" was just what I wanted on a Saturday afternoon in August .. escapist entertainment, silly fun, dominated by a performance with a lot of heart! Be aware that it's still a forced premise for a musical; plus, you've got to like ABBA's music (so much of it has a sameness about it); but, if leave your critic's hat at home and just go to have fun, you will.
Off-topic: I was delighted to fill up my gas tank at $3.59/gallon yesterday. The price is down 53 cents a gallon in the past two weeks. My first thought? "When's the Republican National Convention?" LOL! I'll take it.
A few comments ... Is there anything that Meryl Streep can't do? She was a funny, whimsical, bawdy and touching center to the film. She sang really well, especially knocking my socks off in "The Winner Takes It All". Amanda Seyfield, the young woman playing Sophie, her daughter, was simply splendid! The mother-daughter relationship between the two of them was completely believable. Julie Walters nearly stole the show as Streep's quirky cookbook author friend; Christine Baranski, with her roots firmly planted in Broadway, was a hoot as the thrice-divorced Sonia (though I admit her solo number on the beach was unexpectedly discomforting to me).
The male performances were a mixed bag. Pierce Brosnan and Streep certainly had chemistry, but his singing was amateurish. (It was actually better than I expected from what I'd read.) I didn't like the young actor playing Skye, Sophie's fiance, shirtless or with his shirt on. Now, Colin Firth ... that's another story ... *swoon* ... and his singing was quite good. What made the movie so much fun was the use of a literal Greek chorus that popped up at odd moments, played for laughs. Also, the gorgeous location in the Greek Islands didn't hurt the eyes! :) All in all, "Mama Mia" was just what I wanted on a Saturday afternoon in August .. escapist entertainment, silly fun, dominated by a performance with a lot of heart! Be aware that it's still a forced premise for a musical; plus, you've got to like ABBA's music (so much of it has a sameness about it); but, if leave your critic's hat at home and just go to have fun, you will.
Off-topic: I was delighted to fill up my gas tank at $3.59/gallon yesterday. The price is down 53 cents a gallon in the past two weeks. My first thought? "When's the Republican National Convention?" LOL! I'll take it.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 03:06 pm (UTC)Glad that you made these comments
Date: 2008-08-03 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 11:07 pm (UTC)What got me about the film was how well it was directed, shot, edited, and paced. Mr. Lane had citicized the film for its theatrical (as opposed to filmic) tendencirs. I disagree. I especially liked the way the film combined theatrical technques with cinema craft. But analysis aside, it was just plain fun to watch! My one regret was that I caught the late show, with an audience of about 6 people ... the film should be seem with a sizeable audience, especially for the final encore.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 11:46 pm (UTC)I was concerned I wouldn't like Meryl Streep, instead I ended up really disliking Pierce.
Meryl's presentation of The Winner Takes It All was perfect. It was very different from any that I've seen before and fit the movie perfectly. I love when someone sings a song so that you stop and really listen to the words and you say to yourself, "Oh, that's what the song is about."
I also agree that they could have found someone much sexier to play Skye - they must have run out of money.
I also found Baranski's beach number off and unsettling.
There also seemed to be times that the photography was off - like the background was a bluescreen and not done right.
There are a lot of wonderful aspects of the musical version that they should have worked harder to pull into the movie.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 03:17 am (UTC)I rank ABBA with Carpenters: Technically exellent, well performed, but utterly generic. I've never understood the cult status that ABBA has acheived, and certainly don't understand why anyone would structure a musical or a movie around their songs.
I guess I'm simply not part of "Mama Mia"'s target audience.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 03:31 am (UTC)Re: Glad that you made these comments
Date: 2008-08-04 03:34 am (UTC)Streep always amazes me .. She can give depth to anything thrown her way. I also had a feeling that this role was very close to who she is in reality. Enjoy!
Schmaltz ... and I love it!
Date: 2008-08-04 03:38 am (UTC)HUGS!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 03:42 am (UTC)I'm glad that someone agreed with me about the beach number. There was unnecessary vulgarity to the staging and I didn't find anything appealing about the young bartender. Now, the guy who Colin Firth's character had his eye on .. Yowsa! :)
I enjoyed it for what it was ... a breath of fresh air, a break from all of the action adventure movies based on comic book characters.
HUGS!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 03:45 am (UTC)Hugs, my friend!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 03:51 am (UTC)I've never understood the cult status that ABBA has acheived, and certainly don't understand why anyone would structure a musical or a movie around their songs.
Ditto! It is contrived, but within the forced premise, there's a lot of fun to be had. Plus, there simply isn't much out there to view this summer .. I enjoyed "Wall-E" and "Kit Kittredge", but disliked "Hellboy II".
Like I said, I took off my critic's hat and had a good time at "Mama Mia".
HUGS!
Re: Schmaltz ... and I love it!
Date: 2008-08-04 04:19 am (UTC)Hugs!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 04:30 am (UTC)As to Mr. Firth's young Greek guy: I spotted him in an early scene - and drooled every time he appeared.
The idea of a "Greek chorus" - literally, composed of local island Greeks - was rather brilliant I thought. I got a kick out of all those people hurling themselves into the musical numbers with such abandon and gusto.
I agree with your point: a pleasant respite from comic-book land.
I plan on seeing it this week.
Date: 2008-08-04 04:37 am (UTC)Re: I plan on seeing it this week.
Date: 2008-08-04 11:39 am (UTC)Re: Schmaltz ... and I love it!
Date: 2008-08-04 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 11:43 am (UTC)HUGS!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 11:44 am (UTC)Big HUGS!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-05 01:13 am (UTC)HUGS!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-05 04:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 01:21 am (UTC)Take care!.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 05:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 12:19 am (UTC)HUGS!